Magic Eden vs Tensor
How we compare: both records come from the same registry and carry the same sourcing rules — every figure links back to the marketplace’s own fee page or a dated secondary source. Sorted alphabetically, not ranked. Our methodology.
| Attribute | Magic Eden | Tensor |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Active | Active |
| Operator | Magic Eden | Tensor |
| Marketplace fee | 0% buyer / 2% seller | 2% buyer / 0% seller |
| Fee model | flat percentage | maker taker |
| Royalties | optional per collection | enforced for pnft |
| Chains | solana | solana |
| Asset categories | art, collectibles, gaming, utility | art, collectibles, gaming |
| Custody | non-custodial | non-custodial |
| Selling formats | fixed price, offers, auctions | fixed price, collection bids, amm pools |
| Buying formats | fixed price, offers, collection bids | fixed price, bids, sweeps |
| Wallet | required | required |
| AUD support | no | no |
| Fiat on-ramp | yes | no |
| Verified | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-20 |
Where they differ
- On the published marketplace fee, Magic Eden is cheaper for buyers (0% vs 2%). Total cost still includes royalties and gas — see the fee guide.
- On the published marketplace fee, Tensor is cheaper for sellers (0% vs 2%). Total cost still includes royalties and gas — see the fee guide.
- Shared chains: solana.
- Magic Eden covers categories Tensor does not list: utility.
Bottom line: neither venue is “better” in the abstract — the right choice depends on your asset, chain and total cost. Read the full profiles: Magic Eden · Tensor, or return to the directory.
Sources
Magic Eden record verified 2026-09-20; Tensor record verified 2026-09-20.