WAX NFT Marketplaces Compared
How we compare: both records come from the same registry and carry the same sourcing rules — every figure links back to the marketplace’s own fee page or a dated secondary source. Sorted alphabetically, not ranked. Our methodology.
| Attribute | AtomicHub | NeftyBlocks |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Active | Active |
| Operator | Pink Network (AtomicAssets) | NeftyBlocks |
| Marketplace fee | 0% buyer / 2% seller | 0% buyer / 2% seller |
| Fee model | flat percentage | flat percentage |
| Royalties | see notes | see notes |
| Chains | other | other |
| Asset categories | collectibles, gaming, art | collectibles, gaming, art |
| Custody | non custodial | non custodial |
| Selling formats | fixed price, auctions, offers | fixed price, auctions, offers, mints |
| Buying formats | fixed price, auctions, offers, mints | fixed price, auctions, offers, mints |
| Wallet | required | required |
| AUD support | no | no |
| Fiat on-ramp | no | no |
| Verified | 2026-10-04 | 2026-10-07 |
Where they differ#
- Shared chains: other.
Bottom line: neither venue is “better” in the abstract — the right choice depends on your asset, chain and total cost. Read the full profiles: AtomicHub · NeftyBlocks, or return to the directory.
Sources#
AtomicHub record verified 2026-10-04; NeftyBlocks record verified 2026-10-07.