OpenSea vs Tensor

How we compare: both records come from the same registry and carry the same sourcing rules — every figure links back to the marketplace’s own fee page or a dated secondary source. Sorted alphabetically, not ranked. Our methodology.
Attribute OpenSea Tensor
Status Active Active
Operator Ozone Networks, Inc. (OpenSea) Tensor
Marketplace fee 0% buyer / 1% seller 2% buyer / 0% seller
Fee model flat percentage maker taker
Royalties optional per collection enforced for pnft
Chains ethereum, solana, polygon, base, arbitrum, optimism, avalanche, blast, zora, other solana
Asset categories art, collectibles, domain-names, gaming, music, photography, sports, utility, virtual-worlds art, collectibles, gaming
Custody non-custodial non-custodial
Selling formats fixed price, english auction, offers fixed price, collection bids, amm pools
Buying formats fixed price, offers, sweeps fixed price, bids, sweeps
Wallet required required
AUD support no no
Fiat on-ramp yes no
Verified 2026-09-22 2026-09-22

Where they differ

  • On the published marketplace fee, OpenSea is cheaper for buyers (0% vs 2%). Total cost still includes royalties and gas — see the fee guide.
  • On the published marketplace fee, Tensor is cheaper for sellers (0% vs 1%). Total cost still includes royalties and gas — see the fee guide.
  • Shared chains: solana.
  • OpenSea only: ethereum, polygon, base, arbitrum, optimism, avalanche, blast, zora, other.
  • OpenSea covers categories Tensor does not list: domain-names, music, photography, sports, utility, virtual-worlds.
Bottom line: neither venue is “better” in the abstract — the right choice depends on your asset, chain and total cost. Read the full profiles: OpenSea · Tensor, or return to the directory.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *